Hereditary Disease Foundation
Click here
for ways of
giving to HDF
Donate NOW to HDF
3960 Broadway, 6th Floor – New York, NY 10032
phone: 212.928.2121, fax: 212.928.2172

cures@hdfoundation.org

Return to Past Workshop Reports main page

Workshop Reports

 

Hereditary Disease
Foundation


Nuclear Inclusions and the Pathogenesis of
Polyglutamine Diseases



December 13 and 14, 1997
Playa Del Rey, California

Prepared by Jang-Ho Cha
                               
                                             HEREDITARY DISEASE FOUNDATION WORKSHOP
"Nuclear Inclusions and the Pathogenesis of Polyglutamine Diseases"
                    December 13 and 14, 1997
                       Playa del Rey, CA
                          Participants
                               
Barbara Brodsky
Professor, Department of Biochemistry
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
Piscataway, New Jersey 08854

Jang-Ho Cha
Instructor in Neurology, Department of Neurology
Neurological Research, WRN408
Massachusetts General Hospital
Fruit Street
Boston, Massachusetts  02114

Bruce Chesebro
Laboratory Chief
Rocky Mountain Laboratories
903 South 4th Street
Hamilton, Montana  59840

Robert Hughes
Research Scientist
Department of Genetics, Box 357360
University of Washington
J-205 Health Sciences Building
Seattle, Washington  98195-7360

Vernon Ingram
John & Dorothy Wilson Professor of Biochemistry
Director, Experimental Study Group
Housemaster, Ashdown House
Department of Biology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Room 56-601
Cambridge, Massachusetts  02139-4307

Jeffery Kelly
Lita Annenberg Hazen Professor of Chemistry
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 North Torrey Pines Road
Mail Stop MB12
La Jolla, California 92037
Diane Merry
Research Assistant
Professor of Neurology and Genetics
Department of Neurology
University of Pennsylvania
415 Curie Boulevard
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  19104

Cameron Mura
Graduate Student
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
University of California Los Angeles
Box 951570
Los Angeles, California  90095-1570

Henry Paulson
Assistant Professor, Neurology
Department of Neurology
University of Iowa Hospitals
Iowa City, Iowa  52242

Terry Reisine
Scientific Director
Davis Biomedical Association
2121 Avenue of the Stars
Suite 2800
Los Angeles, California 90067

Christopher Ross
Professor of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology
Ross Building 618
Johns Hopkins University
720 Rutland Avenue
Baltimore, Maryland  21205-2196

Ethan Signer
Executive Director, Cure HD Initiative
Hereditary Disease Foundation
1427 7th Street, Suite 2
Santa Monica, California 90401
Professor of Biology Emeritus
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Room 68-150
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Allan Tobin
Scientific Director
Hereditary Disease Foundation
1427 7th Street, Suite 2
Santa Monica, California 90401
Eleanor Leslie Endowed Chair in Neuroscience
Director, Brain Research Institute
University of California Los Angeles
73-369 Center for the Health Sciences
Los Angeles, California 90095-1761

Martin Vey
Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Neurology HSE-781
University of California San Francisco
School of Medicine
San Francisco, California  94143-0518

Jonathan Weissman
Assistant Professor, Cellular & Molecular
Pharmacology and Biochemistry & Biophysics
University of California San Francisco
513 Parnassus Avenue
Post Office Box 0450
San Francisco, California  94143 Ronald Wetzel
Professor of Medicine
Department of Medicine
University of Tennessee Medical Center
1924 Alcoa Highway
Knoxville, Tennessee  37920

Nancy Wexler
President
Hereditary Disease Foundation
1427 7th Street, Suite 2
Santa Monica, California 90401
Higgins Professor of Neuropsychology
Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry
College of Physicians and Surgeons
Columbia University
722 West 168th Street, Box 58
New York, New York  10032   Overview
       The recent observation of neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NII) in the brains
  of Huntington's disease (HD) patients and transgenic HD mouse models has
  provided a novel perspective on the pathogenesis of this  and other so-called
  polyglutamine diseases (Davies et al., 1997; DiFiglia et al., 1997; Ross, 1997).  This
  workshop brought together scientists of various disciplines to discuss the implication
  of NII and their possible role in causing disease.
 
  Introduction
       The meeting opened with introduction of a 25 year old young woman with HD
  and her husband. She discussed how her HD had been diagnosed and the impact
  that this diagnosis has had on her life.  Her husband described the difficulties which
  they have had as her disease symptoms progressed.   Although she was diagnosed
  just earlier in the year, she has already had to give up many of her favorite activities
  such as skiing and many other sports, and is no longer able to continue in her
  profession of modeling and architecture. Both she and her husband cited their
  religious faith as a source of strength, as well as their optimism in the progress of
  medical research.
       For many of the researchers present, it was the first face-to-face encounter
  with someone with Huntington disease.  Several researchers remarked how
  inspiring it was to actually meet someone with HD, bringing home to them the reality
  of the disease, rather than just an abstract concept.  All concurred that keeping in
  mind the family's perspectives is a true motivating force in any disease-based
  research.  The ensuing discussion centered around the question of whether it was
  fair to families to raise their hopes by offering the prospect of a "cure" for HD.  Allan
  Tobin pointed out that in the case of HD, a small change in the rate of progression
  of disease could functionally amount to a cure.  A similar example might be
  Alzheimer disease, in which effective treatments appear likely, while ultimate cures
  may be impossible.  Another point is that most medical successes are examples of
  effective treatments rather than pure "cures."  While a "cure" for HD in the sense of
  total eradication of the disease might not be immediately feasible, all agreed that
  treatments might lie within the realm of the possible and should be aggressively
  sought.  Nancy Wexler pointed out that in 1968, the use of the neuroleptic Haldol
  was standard treatment for people with HD, while now Haldol is not used nearly as
  much, and antidepressants are widely and effectively used.
 
  Transgenic Mice and Neuronal Intranuclear Inclusions
       Chris Ross initiated the next portion of the workshop by showing two
  videotapes of transgenic mice. 
       The first video showed transgenic mice into which were inserted the N-
  terminal portion of truncated HD gene containing an expanded CAG (82 repeats)
  region.  Working with David Borchelt and Gabrielle Schilling, Dr. Ross has created
  three lines of mice each containing 82 repeats.  All three mouse lines develop
  neurologic symptoms, but with different ages of onset, ranging from 2 to 6 months
  of age.  Depending on the line, these mice have a life span of 5 to 10 months
  (normal life span for a mouse is greater than 1 year).  Symptoms include difficulty
  walking, tremor, and uncoordinated movements.  When control mice walk, they
  demonstrate a fluid flexible movements, shifting weight easily, striding rapidly.
  When picked up by the tail, control mice attempt to escape.  Transgenic mice
  appear less well groomed and unsteady on their feet.  When picked up by the tail,
  they are especially uncoordinated and unable to escape. Ross' mice  demonstrate
  clasping of their back paws, a trait also reported in Gill Bates' transgenic HD mice.
  As the Ross mice age, they become more slow, stiff and lethargic.  At end stage,
  they are very hypomotile.
       Following the video presentation, Chris Ross described the approach they
  have taken in making their transgenic mice.  For the HD mouse, they have used a
  cDNA construct which conatins the N-terminal 160 residues, including 82 glutamine
  repeats (N-160, Q-82).  Their numbering system is based on the original HD gene
  paper in which the reported sequence has 23 CAG repeats (Huntington's Disease
  Collaborative Research Group, 1993).  The transgene is under the control of the
  prion promoter, which is highly expressed in brain, with lower expression levels in
  heart and other tissues.  They have made three different mouse lines.  The mouse
  lines express 20 to 50 copies of the transgene, but overall transgenic protein
  expression levels are lower than the levels of endogenous mouse huntingtin.
       Gill Bates' group was the first to make a transgenic mouse model. This model
  also expresses a truncated exon 1 of huntingtin, but (i) the construct is a genomic
  as opposed to a cDNA construct, (ii) expression is under the control of the human
  HD promoter, and (iii) the repeat number is higher (120 to 150 glutamines)
  (Mangiarini et al., 1996).  Ross' group found in analyzing expression of their
  transgene that, although RNA levels are relatively high, protein expression is
  inexplicably low. They have been able to immunostain with the AP 194 antibody (an
  antibody which recognizes the N-terminus of huntingtin made by Allan Sharp at
  John Hopkins University) and by the 1C2 antibody; developed by Yvon Trottier in
  Jean-Louis Mandel's laboratory, this antibody recognizes polyglutamine regions with
  expanded repeats.
       The second video showed transgenic mice expressing a full length
  dentatorubropallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) gene, again, with an expanded CAG
  region (61 repeats).  These mice demonstrate a constant tremor, uncoordinated
  movements, and rapid involuntary forepaw movements which are reminiscent of
  chorea.  Their gait is abnormal, resembling a hopping movement as opposed to the
  more fluid striding of normal mice.  In addition, these mice have seizures, as
  evidenced in the video.
       Ross then went on to comment on the pathbreaking discovery of inclusions
  which Steve Davies has made while analyzing the Bates mice (Davies et al., 1997).
  Ross' group have made these observations as well in its transgenic mice.  In certain
  neurons of both the Bates and Ross transgenic mice, spherical intranuclear
  inclusions are seen.  These inclusions are roughly the size of the nucleolus, and
  they immunostain with antibodies directed against the N-terminus and against
  ubiquitin.  Davies has recently shown that formation of inclusions precedes the
  onset of symptoms in the Bates mice.  Following the description of NII in mice,
  Marian DiFiglia confirmed the presence of these so-called neuronal intranuclear
  inclusions (NII) in human HD brain, and made the first observation that inclusions
  are also found in dystrophic neurites. Mark Becher at Hopkins has confirmed the
  presence of inclusions in dystrophic neurites in human HD brain. Both Bates' and
  Ross' groups have subsequently found inclusions in dystrophic neurites in the
  brains of their transgenic mice. 
       Ross then summarized some of the recent results of Michael Hayden, who
  has found that huntingtin can be cleaved by caspase-3 (formerly known as apopain,
  also known as cpp-32 and yama) (Goldberg et al., 1996).  Caspase-3 recognizes
  the amino acid motif DXXD.  Since the caspases are known to participate in certain
  aspects of programmed cell death, the question of whether HD is an apoptotic
  disease was raised.  The role of caspases in CAG repeat diseases remains unclear.
       Jang-Ho Cha described his work analyzing neurotransmitter receptors in the
  brains of the Bates mice.  Although the transgenic mice brains were originally
  described as appearing morphologically normal, brain weights were decreased
  compared to controls.  Using receptor binding assays, Cha found that there were
  selective decreases in receptor binding in the brains of these mice (receptor and
  binding levels in transgenic mice as a percentage of control mice: NMDA 100%;
  AMPA 85%; kainate 70%, group I metabotropic (G-protein linked) 100%, group II
  metabotropic 65%, GABA 100%, muscarinic acetylcholine 65%, D1 dopamine 33%,
  D2 dopamine 33%).  Receptor binding changes occurred not only in striatum but
  also in cortex.  Decreases in corresponding receptor proteins were confirmed by
  immunoassay.  In situ hybridization demonstrated decreases in corresponding
  mRNA levels (e.g. for the metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR2 and mGluR3,
  mRNA levels were decreased to 50% of control whereas mGluR5 mRNA levels
  were unchanged).  D1 and D2 dopamine receptor mRNA were changed as early as
  4 weeks of age, preceding receptor binding changes and the development of
  symptoms.  One correlate of NII, then, could be altered transcription of
  neurotransmitter receptor messages.
 
  Other transgenic animals
       Ethan Signer then reviewed other HD transgenic animals which have been
  developed.  Danilo Tagle at NIH has made two different transgenic mice, one using
  full length cDNA and the other a truncated cDNA.  Both of Tagle's mice develop
  symptoms, although the mice expressing the truncated version develop symptoms
  more quickly than the mice expressing the full length gene.  Diane Merry pointed
  out that the CMV promoter used by Tagle results in very high level of protein
  expression.
       Signer then went on to describe Rick Myers' (Stanford University) "knock-in"
  mouse. This mouse has the expanded CAG repeats inserted into the mouse's
  endogenous huntingtin gene which to this point show a slightly abnormal
  phenotype, demonstrating increased aggressiveness and some mild hippocampal
  cellular abnormalities.  Wexler then related that Efstratiadis & Scott Zeitlin's knock-
  ins were as yet asymptomatic at one year of age.  Wexler then went on to explain
  that efforts to make inducible transgenics are underway.
 
  Helices and Sheets
       Barbara Brodsky reviewed the properties of glutamine (Gln or Q) residues
  in proteins.  Gln's can exist in ý-helical formations,  -sheets, and have also been
  reported to be found in random coil.  Brodsky also noted that Gln's are often found
  in the neighborhood of polyproline stretches, as is the case with huntingtin.  Gln's
  can thus exist in numerous conformations, but they will not exist on their own.  They
  are most likely to exist in  -sheets or binding to something else.  PolyGln's are
  highly insoluble, so even with wildtype huntingtin proteins (with normal numbers of
  CAG repeats), something is likely acting to keep them soluble.
       Jeffery Kelly told us that  -sheets are 6 to 8 residues per strand, and that
  Gln is the residue that favors sheet formation most.  Kelly went on to speculate that
  the Xray crystallographic structure of the mutated huntingtin would be instructive.
  An abnormally large polyglutamine moiety could drag the whole protein into a 
  sheet configuration, thereby destabilizing the protein.  He further noted that Gln-
  containing peptides can have very  many different properties.
       Cameron Mura (from David Eisenberg's lab) told us about his experiments
  in making polyGln proteins expressed as fusion proteins linked to glutathione-s-
  transferase (GST).  Thus far, he has been successful in obtaining crystallization
  leads  from fusion proteins containing 0, 19, and 35 Gln's. However, he has not
  been able to crystallize GST fusion proteins containing either 62 or 81 Gln's,
  because these proteins abnormally aggregate.  The resultant aggregates are
  difficult to work with and will not even enter a stacking gel, indicating their high
  molecular weight.  The aggregates are resistant to dissolution by 8M guanidinium,
  boiling, DTT, or urea.  These results illustrate the dilemma of working with an
  aggregatable protein: if one is too successful in producing an aggregatable protein,
  an insoluble, hence unanalyzable, dense aggregate will result.  Kelly hypothesized
  that an incremental approach would be needed, for example, starting with a simpler
  protein, e.g. prion protein.
 
  Lessons from Prions
       Bruce Chesebro noted that the structure of prion proteins has now been
  solved in two different laboratories.  However, the final configuration of prion is half
  structured and half unstructured.  Several caveats were offered.  Kelly noted that
  glycosylation has not been taken into account as far as the final prion structure, and
  Martin Vey noted that the recombinant protein has not yet been shown to be
  infectious.  Nevertheless, prion protein was considered to be a good model of a
  disease-related protein which can assume abnormal configurations.  Chesebro
  noted that the repeat regions in prion protein have both Gln and glycine (Gly).
       Chesebro and Vey then briefly reviewed the biology of prion protein.  The
  structure has been partially solved.  NMR evidence indicates that the N-terminal
  portion of the prion protein (amino acid residues 1-100) is amorphous.  In any case,
  this portion of the prion protein has yet to be successfully crystallized.  The structure
  of prion protein has been solved starting from amino acid 122.  Residues 1-23
  constitute the signal peptide of the 254 residue protein.  Residues 23-231 constitute
  the mature protein whose C-terminal is lipidated, and contains two N-linked sugars
  near the COOH terminal.  The first structure that was solved was of the 121-231
  fragment, and the 89-231 structure can be folded into the scrapie isoform.  The
  whole protein assumes the following conformation:
 
       N-terminal (unstructured) --   sheet -- ý helix -- ý helix -- ý helix
 
       Within the "amorphous" region of the prion protein lie five octapeptide
  repeats.  Mutations within these repeats can lead to inherited prion diseases, raising
  a possible similarity to HD, which is a disease of repeated protein structures.
  Chesebro then related an important experiment by Aguzzi in which normal brain
  tissue was transplanted into the brains of mice lacking PrP (prion protein).  PrP null
  mice are resistant to infection by scrapie.  However, PrP null mice which had
  received grafts of normal brain were infected with scrapie, and the affected areas
  extended beyond the areas of the graft.  Thus, infection with an infectious particle
  depended on some crucial interaction with the normal protein.  Paulson then
  observed that "pathologic" markers may not themselves be pathogenic.  That is,
  aggregation of huntingtin may not be the pathologic agent, but the neuronal
  intranuclear inclusions (NII) may only be an abnormal marker.
 
  Fibrils & Aggregates
       How does one study the formation of abnormal protein structures?  Prion
  protein research has taught us that   sheets are potentially pathogenic protein
  formations. The propensity to form   sheet correlates with (i) protease resistance
  and (ii) ability to be pelleted by centrifugation.  These pelleted aggregates bind
  Congo Red, and electron microscopy reveals them to be fibrils.  However, both
  electron microscopy and Congo Red staining are not definitive proof of   sheet
  structure.  The actual mechanism by which Congo Red stains   sheet structures is
  unknown.  Paulson noted that the neuronal intranculear inclusions which he has
  observed in Machado-Joseph disease are negative for Congo Red and thioflavin S
  staining, but that does not guarantee that these inclusions have no   sheet.  Vernon
  Ingram noted that different batches of commercial Alzheimer amyloid (A ) have
  different amounts of aggregate (as opposed to monomer), and Ronald Wetzel
  noted that these differences may result in part from different amounts of
  endogenous aggregate.  In short, aggregation is a nucleation-dependent event
  which itself can be nucleated.
 
  Protein-protein interactions
       The yeast two hybrid system has been used to search for proteins which may
  interact with huntingtin.  Robert Hughes noted that the ability to find interacting
  proteins in the yeast 2 hybrid system depends on the proteins' capacity to exist in
  a soluble state.  Extremely aggregatable proteins may be missed using this
  methodology. 
 
  Transthyretin
       Jeffery Kelly reviewed recent advances in transthyretin, a protein that can
  assume abnormal configurations leading to disease.  Transthyretin is a serum
  protein which is affected in one form of systemic amyloidosis.  Its normal function
  is to bind retinol and thyroxine.  Transthyretin exists as a tetramer, two coassembled
  dimers.  Thyroxine binds at the interface between the two dimers.  Under acidic
  conditions (pH 5.5) the protein undergoes a conformational change into an amyloid-
  forming configuration.  As a functional definition, "amyloid" refers to a protein
  substance which (i) binds Congo Red and (ii) exhibits birefringence.  The structure
  of amyloid is cross-  helices.  Colin Blake has found the structure of  -helix to be
  composed of overlapping   strands oriented at 15¯ per turn, ascending at a rate of
  24 strands per cycle, that is, a twisted   sheet which goes on and on.  Transthyretin
  coassembles into 4 protofilaments.  These protofilaments in turn coalesce into the
  amyloid fibril.
       Amyloid aggregates have only been found extracellularly. Amyloid deposition
  is potentially a reversible process, since patients with systemic amyloidosis who
  receive liver transplants clear large amount of amyloid.  Transgenic mice have been
  created expressing 90 copies of the transthyretin gene. They develop abnormal
  deposits of amyloid at 17 months of age. 
       Amyloidosis resulting from transthyretin occurs when transthyretin switches
  from the normally folded form into the disease-associated amyloid form.  Kelly
  explained a recent experiment published in Science in which analogs of thyroxine
  were used to bind to transthyretin, specifically targeted to the active site.  These
  analogues stabilized the normally folded form of transthyretin.  Kelly went on to note
  that fibril formation is the thermodynamic minimum of all proteins, if they can
  achieve that thermodynamic state.  But most proteins are destined not to get there.
 
  Proteolysis
       Terry Reisine reviewed the role of proteolysis.  NII in the nuclei of cells in HD
  brains are described as containing fragments of huntingtin, suggesting that some
  processing has occurred.  What is the possible role of proteolysis?  What are the
  enzymes involved?  Proteolysis is a highly regulated event.  For example, peptides
  necessarily undergo proteolysis for their normal function.  As an example, the opiate
  precursor molecule POMC requires 3 to 5 proteases to achieve biological activity.
  These enzymes may be differentially distributed throughout the brain, for example,
  the anterior pituitary produces predominantly  -endorphin, and the intermediate lobe
  produces primarily  -MSH.
       Where might cleavage sites exist in huntingtin? The recent report from
  DiFiglia et al. (DiFiglia et al., 1997) describes a truncated 42kD portion of huntingtin
  detectable in nuclear subcellular fractions. Several discussants speculated that
  determining sites of cleavage would be desirable, as this could provide a major clue.
  All agreed that elucidating huntington's normal proteolytic processing would be
  important.  Similarly, looking for enzymes which could preferentially cleave mutant
  protein would be fruitful.
 
  Lessons from Androgen Receptor
       Diane Merry noted that the function of one of the CAG repeat disease
  proteins is known.  Androgen receptor is the protein affected in spinobulbar
  muscular atrophy (SBMA).  Proteolysis does not contribute to processing, but in
  COS cells, they have seen repeat length-dependent differences in localization. She
  has also seen aggregates in her cell culture models.  Using antibodies directed
  against the N-terminal region, she and her colleagues have observed the formation
  of aggregates.  The high molecular weight aggregates are recognized by C-terminal
  antibodies, suggesting that recruitment of normal full length molecules is occurring.
  Also the 1C2 antibody fails to recognize the high molecular weight aggregates.
  What is the nature of the high molecular weight aggregates?  Are these fragments
  which are specifically cleaved at a certain point or are the aggregates a
  conglomeration of fragments of various lengths?
       Kelly theorized that one could use stronger solvents to dissociate the
  aggregates.  Fluorinated alcohols are traditionally used, although recent data
  suggest that chlorinated alcohols (e.g. dichloro-butanol or 2-Cl-butanol) may be
  more effective in dissociating aggregates.  Chlorinated alcohols are rumored to
  much more effective than, for instance, guanidine.  Merry noted that she has
  observed similar aggregates in a cell-free system (GST fusion proteins), so if
  aggregation does involve covalent linking, it is not through enzymatic mechanisms.
 
  Proteasomes and Chaperones
       Jonathan Weissman reviewed proteasomes.  The cell has two proteolytic
  pathways: the lysosomal system for degrading extracellular proteins and the
  proteasome for degrading intracellular proteins.  The proteasome is composed of
  a quadruple ring structure with an antechamber and a catalytic ring.  Ubiquitinated
  proteins are targeted to the proteasome where they are degraded by the 26S moiety
  of the proteasome.  The 26S activity contains within it a deubiquitinating enzyme.
  Conceivably, if a polyGln-containing protein was not cut, the uncleaved portions of
  protein could inhibit the proteasome.  Inhibition of proteasome function in yeast
  leads to cell cycle arrest.  An hypothesis would be that proteasomes are inhibited
  by larger uncleaved pieces of polyGln containing-proteins and these fragments
  would accumulate in post-mitotic cells, since they would not be diluted by mitosis.
  One possible experimental strategy to approaching the role of the proteasome
  would be to construct an exon 1 fragment of huntingtin which lacks Lys, which would
  preclude its ubiquitination.  Weissman also noted that NF- B processing by
  proteasomes is a process which is sequence-independent.  Finally, lactacystin is a
  proteasome inhibitor (Fenteany et al., 1995), although it is somewhat difficult to
  obtain.
       Polyglutamine by itself is undeniably a highly aggregatable moiety.  Many
  proteins have the potential to form aggregates, and yet do not.  Chaperones are
  proteins which can stabilize non-aggregatable conformations of potentially
  aggregating proteins.  Weissman reviewed an experiment by Charnoff and Lindquist
  in which they examined the overexpression of HSP 104 on the behavior of Sup35.
  Sup35 is a yeast protein with a prion domain which can exist in either a soluble or
  aggregate form.  Once aggregated, Sup35 is passed on from generation to
  generation of yeast and is stably transmitted.  HSP 104 is the major heat shock
  protein expressed by yeast in response to heat exposure.  HSP 104 has homology
  to clpA, which itself possesses similar activity to the 26S proteasome.  HSP 104
  also has ATPase activity.  When HSP 104 is overexpressed in yeast with the
  aggregated form of Sup35, HSP 104 can reverse the aggregation of Sup35.
  Interestingly, HSP 104 knockout yeast are unable to propagate Sup35 aggregates.
  Thus, HSP 104 seems to have two potential roles with regard to aggregates: (i) HSP
  104 can reverse aggregation of Sup35 and (ii) the presence of HSP 104 may be in
  some way necessary to allow aggregation to occur in the first place.  Two
  hypotheses have been put forth to explain the curious result with the HSP 104
  knockouts. Lindquist has argued that HSP 104 binding to Sup35 is required for
  assembly of monomers into aggregates, but that binding of too much HSP 104 ties
  up the monomer and prevents aggregation. Ter-Avanesyan has theorized that HSP
  104 is required to break up aggregates so they are distributed to both mother and
  daughter upon cell division. Without HSP 104 the aggregates are not broken up and
  are distributed to only one of the two resulting cells, whereupon the cell that did not
  receive them has a selective advantage and overgrows the population.
       HSP 104 possesses other interesting properties in that it can break apart
  aggregates of many types of proteins, not just of Sup35.  HSP 104 has the ability
  to disrupt strong noncovalent bonds.  In mammalian cells, HSP 70 might be
  expected to serve some of the roles which are served by HSP 104 in yeast.
 
  Inclusions and Recruitment
       Paulson noted that inclusions are found in a number of neurologic diseases.
  Marinesco bodies have been described in normal aging but have some
  resemblance to the nuclear bodies in SCA3.  Lewy bodies are cytoplasmic
  structures which are immunopositive for ubiquitin and ý-synuclein.  Paulson
  described the process of recruitment, citing examples drawn from spinocerebellar
  ataxia 3 (SCA3, also known Machado-Joseph disease).  SCA3 is the most common
  inherited ataxia, in which the brainstem and substantia nigra undergo degeneration.
  Whereas huntingtin is a large protein of 350kD, the protein involved in SCA3,
  ataxin-3 is only 42kD.  In distinction to huntingtin, in which the polyGln stretch is
  located closer to the N-terminus, in ataxin-3 the polyGln is located closer to the C-
  terminus.  The shortest number of repeats known to cause SCA3 disease is 61. 
       Paulson and his group have made constructs of either full length ataxin-3 or
  truncated forms of ataxin-3 containing the C-terminal domain with the glutamine
  repeat.  For both full length and truncated ataxin-3, the repeat length is either
  normal (n = 27) or expanded (n = 78).  If cells are transfected with (i) a full length
  construct containing an expanded repeat or (ii) a truncated construct with an
  unexpanded CAG repeat, immunostaining for ataxin-3 reveals a diffuse cytoplasmic
  pattern.  However, if cells are transfected instead with a truncated ataxin-3 with an
  expanded CAG repeat region, inclusions are seen.  Some small intranuclear
  inclusions are seen, but there are also large perinuclear inclusions.  In coexpression
  experiments, truncated expanded molecules form insoluble aggregates which can
  recruit full length proteins with expanded CAG repeats.  Recruitment seems to be
  complete, in that immunofluorescence staining reveals that all of the full length
  molecules are conglomerated into the inclusions, and seem to require a glutamine
  domain in the recruited protein. Paulson noted that he did not know the
  stoichiometry of the truncated:recruited protein interaction.
       Another example of recruitment has been described by Michael Hayden.  In
  his transfected cells, truncated copies of huntingtin containing an expanded CAG
  repeat are able to form inclusions in which are also found copies of full length
  huntingtin proteins.
 
  Final Thoughts & Suggested Experiments
       Brodsky suggested making transgenic mice with the remainder of  the
  huntingtin molecule (i.e. without the N-terminus).  Does this affect the protein?
  Study the nature of polyGln: what is the nature of aggregated polyGln?  Then, try
  to dissolve it using chlorinated alcohols.  Make an aggregate affinity column and see
  what binds to it. 
       Cha proposed stopping aggregation and seeing if pathology would be
  arrested.  Also, would the proteasome really be inhibited by huntingtin with
  expanded repeat?
       Chesebro suggested using FT-IR or CD to get structural information, but
  also to look for other compounds, e.g. glycosaminoglycans (GAG's).  Another
  suggestion was to create tetraparental mice such that animals would grow up
  expressing mixtures of HD exon 1 (truncated) and wild type huntingtin to addresss
  the issue of recruitment.
       Hughes proposed making cell based models to monitor aggregation, which
  can then be used to screen compounds and gene libraries.  Also, understanding cell
  specificity would be key to understanding the pathogenesis.
       Ingram wondered if there was a threshold phenomenon which differentiated
  normal and pathological length huntingtin.  He would screen compounds which
  interfere with (i) the normal role of huntingtin and (ii) stabilize conformation due to
  expanded length.  Next, was there a difference in long Gln aggregates and shorter
  exon 1 with peptide motifs, that is, what is the abnormal function of the aggregated
  structure?
       Merry wondered about the high resolution structure of huntingtin.  She would
  then design compounds to block aggregation and test the hypothesis that
  aggregation is pathologic. She would also use high throughout screening in vitro to
  find compounds which could prevent aggregates.  Also what roles do chaperones
  play in processing and aggregation?
       Mura proposed to: 1) look at structure of polyGln and Fab structure of 1C2.
  2) What does "aggregate" really mean?  One should create Cys mutants to
  distinguish conformations. 3) Use mass spectrometry to see if protein is covalently
  bound in the aggregates. 4) Do genome searches for Gln motifs    Paulson
  proposed finding the 42kD fragment, which has been observed in HD brain by
  DiFiglia et al.,  and seeing if it is really in NII and dystrophic neurites.  If so,
  determine the exact cleavage site, and determine the protease involved.
       Reisine suggested screening for drug compounds which can bind to the
  polyGln region, and also drugs which inhibit the catabolism of huntingtin.
       Signer suggested looking for the mRNA species which are first affected
  following transfection with huntingtin. He also noted that we need more basic
  structural information regarding huntingtin.
       Tobin concluded that it would be nice to know what the protein does.
  Certain crystallographic efforts are underway: Perutz, using Merry's construct for
  androgen receptor; Mura looking at huntingtin; and Pat Law (UPenn) looking at
  ataxin3.  Maybe sickle cell anemia is a more appropriate model for HD than
  metabolic diseases, since it is a protein-protein interaction disease.
       Vey stated that using inducible knockouts, one should explore the role of
  huntingtin in adult life.  Is it necessary for normal functioning? One could then use
  antisense or ribozyme strategies to knockout the function of huntingtin. One could
  also make a construct linking the huntingtin promoter to GFP and then screen for
  compounds which could turn off huntingtin expression.  He would also express
  GFP-polyGln in cell lines to screen compound libraries, using the FRET double
  fluorescence system or by using inducible promoters.
       Weissman thought purified aggregates should be subjected to mass
  spectrometry in order to discern the components of the aggregates.
       Wetzel stated that recruitment of proteins was tantalizing. Therefore
  analyzing the components of the inclusions was key. He proposed to test
  recruitment in vitro: is it possible to recruit into these inclusions?
 
  References
 
       Davies SW, Turmaine M, Cozens BA, DiFiglia M, Sharp AH, Ross CA,
  Scherzinger E, Wanker EE, Mangiarini L, and Bates GP (1997). Formation of
  neuronal intranuclear inclusions underlies the neurological dysfunction in mice
  transgenic for the HD mutation. Cell 90:537-48.
      
       DiFiglia M, Sapp E, Chase KO, Davies SW, Bates GP, Vonsattel JP, and
  Aronin N (1997). Aggregation of huntingtin in neuronal intranuclear inclusions and
  dystrophic neurites in brain. Science 277:1990-1993.
      
       Fenteany G, Standaert RF, Lane WS, Choi S, Corey EJ, and Schreiber SL
  (1995). Inhibition of proteasome activities and subunit-specific amino-terminal
  threonine modification by lactacystin. Science 268:726-731.
      
       Goldberg YP, Nicholson DW, Rasper DM, Kalchman MA, Koide HB, Graham
  RK, Bromm M, Kazemi-Esfarjani P, Thornberry NA, Vaillancourt JP, and Hayden
  MR (1996). Cleavage of huntingtin by apopain, a proapoptotic cysteine protease,
  is modulated by the polyglutamine tract. Nature Genet. 13:442-449.
      
       Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group (1993). A novel gene
  containing a trinucleotide repeat that is unstable in Huntington's disease
  chromosomes. Cell 72:971-983.
      
       Mangiarini L, Sathasivam K, Seller M, Cozens B, Harper A, Hetherington C,
  Lawton M, Trottier Y, Lehrach H, Davies SW, and Bates GP (1996). Exon 1 of the
  HD gene with an expanded CAG repeat is sufficient to cause a progressive
  neurological phenotype in transgenic mice. Cell 87:493-506.
      
       Ross CA (1997). Intranuclear neuronal inclusions: a common mechanism for
  glutamine-repeat neurodegenerative diseases? Neuron 19:1147-1150.

 

Hereditary Disease Foundation
     

This site is copyrighted © 2008 Hereditary Disease Foundation. All rights reserved.
Site Maintained by  DorriOlds.com
.