Hereditary Disease Foundation
Click here
for ways of
giving to HDF
Donate NOW to HDF
3960 Broadway, 6th Floor – New York, NY 10032
phone: 212.928.2121, fax: 212.928.2172

cures@hdfoundation.org

Return to Past Workshop Reports main page

Workshop Reports

 

          Hereditary Disease Foundation
         
         
          Genetic Models of Treatment and Cure for
          Huntington's Disease
         
         
          January 11 and 12, 1997
          Santa Monica, California
         
          Prepared by Mary Elizabeth Bach
         
            Genetic Models of Treatment and Cure for Huntington's Disease
                     January 11 and 12, 1997
                     Santa Monica, California

Participants
Mary Elizabeth Bach
Columbia University
    
Gillian Bates
Guy's and St. Thomas's Hospital
    
M. Flint Beal
Massachusetts General Hospital
    
Marie-Fran‡oise Chesselet
University of California Los Angeles
    
Don Cleveland
University of California San Diego
    
Robert C. Collins
University of California Los Angeles
    
Stephen Davies
University College London

Peter Detloff
University of Alabama Birmingham
    
Allison Doupe
University of California San Francisco
    
Stephen B. Dunnett
University of Cambridge
    
Robert H. Edwards
University of California San Francisco

Argiris Efstratiadis
Columbia University

Kenneth H. Fischbeck
University of Pennsylvania

Susan Hockfield
Yale University

J. Graeme Hodgson
University of British Columbia

Carlo Iannicola
Stanford University

Greg E. Lemke
The Salk Institute

Jose Lucas
Columbia University

Marcy E. MacDonald
Massachusetts General Hospital

John C. Mazziotta
University of California Los Angeles

Edward R.B. McCabe
University of California Los Angeles

Paul H. Patterson
California Institute of Technology

Christopher Ross
Johns Hopkins University

Ira Shoulson
University of Rochester

Ethan Signer
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Larry W. Swanson
University of Southern California

Danilo Tagle
National Institutes of Health
    
Allan Tobin
University of California Los Angeles
    
Nancy Wexler
Columbia University

Jacqueline K. White
Massachusetts General Hospital

Charles Wilson
University of Tennessee Memphis

Anne B. Young
Massachusetts General Hospital

Scott O. Zeitlin
Columbia University

S. Lawrence Zipursky
University of California Los Angeles
Genetic Models of Treatment and Cure for Huntington's Disease
                January 11 and 12, 1997
                Santa Monica, California
                           

                           
    Transplant Therapy

      The workshop opened with the introduction of two people with Huntington's
    disease (HD) and a focus on fetal cell transplant surgery therapy.  One person had
    undergone the transplant surgery whereas the other person was considering it.
    Both the individual who had had the surgery and his wife agreed that the
    behavioral symptoms of HD had been ameliorated by the surgery although there
    was no effect on his motor symptoms.  The person's wife pointed out though that
    the behavioral improvement had begun to occur prior to the surgery during pre-
    surgery testing suggestive of a placebo effect.  The family was wrestling with
    whether a modest quality of life improvement was worth the cost and potential risk
    of the surgery.  The surgery is expensive and not covered by insurance. There was
    also discussion of the critical necessity of pre and post implantation assessments
    according to the HD-CAPIT internationally agreed upon guidelines. Regular follow-
    up examinations to assess short and long term effects are critical to compare
    before and after functions.

      Many participants wrote in their workshop summaries that meeting the people
    and their families inspired them and kept them aware of the big picture and the
    implications of their own work in the search for a cure.
   
    Overview of Genetic Mouse Models of HD

      The genetic mouse models of HD were discussed next.  A wide variety of
    genetic approaches are being employed to generate the mouse models including
    knock-in and transgenic strategies.  The importance of phenotype reproducibility
    was discussed at great length as reproducibility across these models may reveal
    molecular mechanisms that will be vital in the search for a cure.  In the knock-in
    models, one issue that might affect phenotype reproducibility is the loxP sites that
    are left behind.  To date, in all the models studied, the loxP site does not appear to
    affect expression.  Several issues that might affect phenotype reproducibility in the
    transgenic models were discussed.  In the transgenic models both cDNA and YAC
    constructs under the control of different promoters (CMV, Hdh or HPRT) have been
    employed.  The site of integration varies across models and this may affect
    reproducibility.  Second, the models differ in terms of whether a full length or
    truncated transgene was inserted.  Third, the promoter controlling transgene
    expression has varied across the models.  Lastly, an issue that might affect
    phenotype reproducibility in both knock-in and transgenic models is strain
    background. 

      Behavioral phenotype reproducibility will also be important in the search for a
    cure.  To date in many of the models, both transgenic and knock-in, behavioral
    phenotypes have been observed.  In many, movement disorders were exhibited
    (tremors, head twitches, and stereotypic grooming) although differences between
    phenotypes have also been observed (breeding difficulties, seizures, both weight
    loss and gain and both an increase and decrease in reactivity and activity).  There
    is currently no consensus in terms of which aspects of the phenotypes should be
    targeted for therapeutic approaches.  This may become clear with the emergence
    of ubiquitous phenotypes in and across current and future models and a more in
    depth analysis of these models. 

      Lastly, many of the researchers generating the mouse models commented that
    the cost of maintaining their colonies is large and hinders their progress in a search
    for a cure.  Assistance from the Foundation was requested.
   
    Specific Models
    Carlo Iannicola representing Rick Myers laboratory

      Rick Myers' laboratory has generated transgenic models carrying 39 out of 67
    exons and 67 CAG repeats under the control of either the CMV or Hdh promoter.
    The protein expression levels of the transgene were analyzed in kidney, liver and
    brain tissues and were found to vary.  Further, expression under the CMV promoter
    was found to be higher than under the Hdh promoter.  Dr. Iannicola employed
    Jean-Louis Mandel's antibody that recognizes proteins with long stretches of
    glutamines.

      A behavioral phenotype was observed at 5 months in lines generated with both
    promoters (CMV:1 line, Hdh:2/4 lines).  Specifically, "explosive" jerking and
    twitching was observed in addition to excessive grooming and scratching.  No
    weight loss was observed in either the founders or F1s and both feed normally. 

      According to Dr. Iannicola, at 8 months, a MRI examination (which has been
    found to be accurate in mice) was done at Good Samaritan Hospital and revealed
    in mutants an increase in lateral ventricle volume (5-10 fold).  Dr. Iannicola pointed
    out that this is interesting given that people with HD also exhibit an increase in
    ventricle volume.  This increase was observed in mutants generated with either the
    Hdh and CMV promoter. Dr. Iannicola said further MRI studies are necessary to
    validate these findings.

      Dr. Iannicola's laboratory has also generated YAC transgenics with 67 CAG
    repeats.  This work is in the early stages and no other information was available.

      Lastly, Dr. Iannicola discussed the progress of knock-in mice currently being
    generated in the laboratory by Peggy Shelbourne.  A human exon containing 70-80
    repeats replaced mouse exon 1.  A behavioral phenotype emerged at 6 months
    Specifically, hyperactivity and movement disorders were exhibited.  In a subset of
    the knock-in mice sudden "back flips" were observed although this may be
    consistent with vestibular damage.
   
    Jaqueline White and Marcy MacDonald

      Drs. White and MacDonald have generated a knock-in mouse model with 20,
    48, 89 and >120 repeats.  The first 17 amino acids of exon 1 from the mouse were
    retained, while the remainder of the exon consists of human sequence with the
    expanded CAG repeat.  A neo cassette, flanked by bacteriophage P1 loxP site-
    specific recombination sequences, was inserted 950bp upstream of the ATG.  In
    mice with the neo cassette present, no expression was detected.  Knock-in mice
    were also generated in which the neo cassette was excised in the presence of cre
    recombinase by site-specific recombinase.  To remove the neo cassette the knock-
    in mice were mated with a cre transgenic mouse that expresses the recombinase
    early in development (from Gail Martin's laboratory).  Following the removal of the
    neo cassette, normal amounts of protein containing the expanded repeat were
    obtained.  

      A behavioral and neuropathological examination of the mice with 48 repeats has
    been done.  The oldest are 8.5 months and exhibit no behavioral phenotype and
    feed and breed normally.  The neuropathological examination  was done (at 4.5
    months) and no abnormalties were revealed. 
   
    Scott Zeitlin and Argiris Efstratiadis

      Drs. Zeitlin and Efstratiadis have generated knock-in models with 55, 71 and 94
    CAG repeats inserted in exon 1 by replacing a portion of the mouse exon
    (extending from a conserved Xmm I restriction site to the end of the Exon) with
    human sequence from a person with juvenile onset of HD containing the expanded
    CAG and polyproline repeats.  The 5' splice site of the first intron was re-created
    with linker sequence and approximately 100 bp of the intron was deleted up to an
    internal Kpn I site. 

      In lines with 94 CAG repeats, the neo cassette, flanked by loxP sites, was
    inserted 600bp upstream of the transcription initiation site.  Five ES lines were
    generated (3 using CCE 33ES cells and 2 using W9.5ES cells).  In lines with either
    55 or 71 CAG repeats the neo cassette was inserted 1.3kb upstream of the cap
    site.  The targeted allele expression in the line with 94 CAG repeats was
    approximately 33-50% of the wild-type allele. 

      In the lines with either 55 or 71 CAG repeats, expression levels from the
    targeted allele were similar to the wild-type allele.  The neo cassette was removed
    by transient expression of Cre recombinase in the ES cell (targeted ES cells were
    transfected with a supercoiled form of 1:50).  Expression levels of the targeted
    alleles (measured in ES cells) were unaffected by removal of the neo cassette.  Dr.
    Zeitlin noted that the discrepancies in the expression levels reported by various
    laboratories generating knock-in mice may be related to the different positions of
    the neo cassettes.  Although homology comparisons suggest that the core
    promoter is within 250bp of the cap site, the promoter is not mapped functionally
    and additional promoter elements may be located at or near some of the neo
    insertion sites. 

      Dr. Zeitlin is currently generating mice from ES clones in which the neo cassette
    has been deleted by cre/lox recombination (Several participants at the meeting
    requested more detailed information on the cre/loxP system which Dr. Zeitlin
    provided.  It can be found at the end of this report).  Analysis of knock-in mice
    lacking the neo cassette should clarify the discrepancies in the expression levels
    observed in different laboratories and perhaps the differences in behavioral
    phenotypes.

      A behavioral phenotype was observed in the lines with 94 CAG repeats and was
    found to correlate with the degree of chimerism.  In mice that were close to 100%
    chimeric, stillborns were observed. 

      In mice that were 70-50% chimeric, tremors and weight loss emerged at about 1
    week of age.  These mice had difficulty moving and rigidity in their limbs.  Organ
    atrophy was also observed and death occurred around 2 weeks of age.  Marie
    Fran‡oise Chesselet did the neuropathological examination and found general
    brain atrophy although no other neuropathology was observed.  Dr. Chesselet
    pointed out that she did not have the appropriate controls due to the spontaneous
    deaths of the knock in mice. 

      In mice that were 50-30% chimeric, slight tremors and weight loss were initially
    observed, though by 3 weeks of age the mice appear to recover and have since
    gained weight and exhibit no tremors.
   
    Gillian Bates

      Dr. Bates and her group have generated transgenic mice using exon 1 of the
    HD gene carrying an expanded CAG repeat (approximately 115 to 150).  From a
    single founder with 5 integration events, 4 separate lines were generated.  Single
    copy integrants were obtained in 2 lines (R6/0-142 repeats; R6/1-116 repeats).
    One line was found to have 3 copy integrants (R6/2- 145 repeats) whereas the last
    line had 6 (R6/5-130-156 repeats).  RT-PCR analysis revealed that the transgene
    was expressed ubiquitously.  Expression levels were variable but in some lines
    similar to endogenous expression. 

      A behavioral phenotype characterized by tremors, seizures and weight loss was
    exhibited in various degrees in lines R6/2, R6/1 and R6/5.  The mice may also be
    incontinent although an alternative interpretation is that they are drinking a greater
    volume of water.  A discussion ensued regarding whether the weight loss observed
    in these mice was due to a failure to gain or weight loss.  The questions
    surrounding the weight and incontinence issues may be answered by metabolic
    studies which are currently being done.  Dr. Wexler noted that metabolic studies
    were done in people with HD.  The calorie intake of the people was found to
    exceed that of their matched spouse.  Further, the extra intake was found to be
    due to the increase in motor activity observed in HD and not a metabolic change.

      Spontaneous deaths have also been observed and may be due to seizures.
    The mice were analyzed for myelin defects given that transgenic models with this
    defect have been found to have both tremors and seizures.  The CNS myelin
    looked normal.  Cardiac defects were also suggested as a cause of seizures.  No
    cardiac examination has been done to date. 

      Fertility is compromised in the transgenics as they are capable of breeding for
    only a short period of time.  Consistent with this, reproductive organ atrophy
    occurs.  Breeding difficulties may have been compounded in these mice by the fact
    the genetic background was C57 and Dr. Bates and other laboratories have found
    this strain ceases to breed across generations.  
   
   
    Stephen Davies

      Dr. Davies has done the neuropathological examination of Dr. Bates' mice with
    the bulk of the analysis occurring on the R/2 line.  The transgenics brains were
    found to be 16-20% smaller.  By contrast their body weight is 60-70% of wild-types.
    Only two significant differences were observed between the transgenics and wild-
    types.  First, shrinkage of cerebellum purkinje cell bodies was detected in
    transgenics.  Second, in a subset (25%) of the transgenics that Dr. Bates
    categorized as "end-state," focal astrocytosis was observed in the dorsal striatum. 

      Immunocytochemistry revealed no difference between transgenic and wild-type
    mice across neurotransmitter systems, receptor density or in the spinal cord.  No
    difference was observed in the transcription factors jun, cfos, or fos B.  One
    hinderance to these studies that Dr. Davis noted is that many of the commonly
    used rodent biological cell markers may not work in mice.  Also little is known
    regarding possible mouse strain differences in these markers or neuropathology.
    Dr. Beal pointed out that strain related differences in vulnerability to MPTP
    neurotoxicity have been observed.

      The striking contrast between the behavioral phenotype and the results of the
    neuropathological examination is inconsistent with the neuropathology observed in
    people with HD.  A discussion ensued regarding whether the observed phenotype
    correlated with cerebellum purkinje cell atrophy and not any functional or structural
    striatial defects.  Dr. Chesselet pointed out that this disparity may be a function of
    the fact that the mice do not live long enough to develop the neuropathology
    observed in late stage people with HD.  Also little is known regarding the biological
    markers during the early stage of HD.  Lastly, the idea was entertained that
    phenotypes observed in the mouse may not mimic those observed in HD.
   
    Peter Detloff

      Dr. Detloff's laboratory has generated several different knock-in models
    (129/C57 background) in which CAG repeats of 39, 70, and 150 were inserted
    within exon 3 of the HPRT gene.  For controls, a construct with a stop codon
    followed by 150 repeats was prepared.  A  targeting vector with CAG repeats
    encoding Ala was also constructed.  To date, the expression level of the mutated
    HPRT protein is not known. 

      A behavioral phenotype has been observed at 24 wks in male mice with 150
    CAG repeats (females are mosaic for the expanded repeat and show no
    phenotype).  The males exhibit handling induced seizures.  EEG recordings in the
    males are consistent with the observation of behavioral seizures.  Tremors may
    also be occurring but only in a small subset of the mutants.  In contrast to Dr.
    Bates' mice, Dr. Detloff's knock-in mice are heavier, weighting approximately 10g
    more than wild-types. Motor activity and strength was assessed using an activity
    monitor and a test of forearm strength.  The activity monitor revealed that mutant
    ambulatory movements were normal.  By contrast, the mutants were found to rear
    up (vertical movements) significantly less.  Forearm strength was significantly
    impaired in the mutants as demonstrated by their inability to hang from a bar. 
   
    Graeme Hodgson

      Dr. Hodgson in Michael Hayden's laboratory has generated YAC transgenics
    with 18 and 48 CAG repeats.  Expression has been measured in both the brain
    and testes.  A behavioral phenotype was observed and correlates with the length
    of the CAG repeats.  No behavioral phenotype has been observed in the YAC
    transgenics with 18 repeats.  By contrast, the transgenics with 48 repeats were
    observed to exhibit head twitches, reactivity, an increase in both activity and
    excessive grooming.  Breeding and weight appear to be normal. 

      Dr. Hodgson also discussed the transgenic mice generated in Michael Hayden's
    laboratory that have 15, 44, 80 and 128 CAG repeats under control of the CMV,
    HPRT or the endogenous Hdh promoter. 

      Lastly, Dr. Hodgson reported that Jamal Nasir is beginning work on a knock-in
    model that has 48 CAG repeats.
   
    Danilo Tagle

      Dr. Tagle's laboratory has generated several mouse transgenic lines using full
    length HD cDNA (all 67 exons) constructs expressed using the CMV promoter.
    The parent full length plasmid containing 16 CAG repeats was initially expressed in
    the baculovirus system.  48 and 89 repeats were each introduced into this
    construct and recloned into pCDNA1.1.  To date, 11 founders of various ages have
    been produced; 5  from the construct with 16 repeats, 3 from 48 repeats and 3
    from 89 repeats.  The transgene has integrated at 1-2 sites although variable copy
    numbers have been observed (as many as 10 copies in a couple of lines).
    Expression seems to be ubiquitous in several tissues examined as per an antibody
    from Rick Myer's laboratory (the HD1 antibody raised against the first 17 amino
    acids of the HD protein). Currently there are no data regarding the relative amount
    of transgene protein expressed versus the amount of mouse endogenous Hdh
    expression.  

      A behavioral phenotype has been observed at 2-3 months.  Specifically, head
    twitching, tremors, stereotypic grooming, a decrease in exploring, activity and
    startle threshold were all observed.  The transgenics were also found to be
    defective at hanging on to a wire mesh, a measure of fore arm strength.  Weight
    and feeding appears to be normal.  No phenotype was observed in the line with 16
    repeats.  Lastly, seizures were not observed in any of the lines. 
   
    Kurt Fischbeck

      Dr. Fischbeck first described transgenic mice generated in Dr. Mandel's
    laboratory.  In these mice a full length mouse cDNA with 73 CAG repeats was
    expressed under control of the CMV promoter.  The expression levels were found
    to be low (1/10 of endogenous allele).  A behavioral phenotype (agraphobia) was
    initially observed but is no longer. 

      In Dr. Fischbeck's laboratory, Diane Merry has generated mice that contain
    androgen receptor cDNA with expanded repeats.  Two different promoters were
    employed, the neurofilament light chain promoter and the neuron-specific enolase
    promoter.  A behavioral phenotype was observed.  The mice were observed to be
    stronger and more aggressive.  At 20 months of age proximal weakness in the
    limbs was observed.  Consistent with this, atrophy of the muscles was detected.
    Death occurs around 22 months.
   
    Jose J. Lucas from Rene Hen's laboratory

      Dr. Lucas is currently involved in generating a mouse model in which the
    mutated Hdh gene will be regulated via the tetracycline transactivator system (tTA)
    (see Mayford, Bach,..Kandel, 1996, Science, ).  The first exon of the mouse Hdh
    protein with a human 94 CAG repeat will be inserted and gene expression will be
    limited to the basal forebrain (including the striatum).  To achieve regulated
    expression of the Hdh gene, two types of mice need to be generated.  In the first
    type of mouse, the tTA gene is expressed under the control of the CaMKIIa
    promoter, which limits expression of the tTA transgene to neurons of the forebrain.
    In the second type of mouse, the tTA-responsive tet-O promoter is linked to the
    Hdh gene.  The tTA gene expresses a eukaryotic transcription activator that binds
    to and activates transcription from the tet-O promoter element; this transcription is
    blocked by the tetracycline analog doxycycline.  When both the tet-O and tTA
    transgenes are introduced into the same mouse, the tet-O -linked Hdh gene will be
    activated but only in those cells that express tTA (those in the forebrain).  To
    determine where in the brain, the expression of the expanded CAG repeat has
    been transactivated Dr. Lucas is also planning to drive expression of a lacZ
    reporter cassette with the tTA system.  Dr. Lucas feels that using the tTA system
    can be valuable as it will help elucidate whether expression of the CAG repeat is
    enough to trigger the disease or if the degeneration seen in neurons in humans is
    due to the ubiquitous low level of the mutated protein in the entire brain. 

      The second approach that Dr. Lucas's laboratory is undertaking involves genetic
    and pharmacological manipulations of the serotonin 5-HT1B receptor.  The genetic
    manipulation involves using the tTA system to drive expression of either Cre
    recombinase or the serontonergic 5-HT1B receptor.  The pharmacological
    manipulations of the 5-HT1B receptor will determine whether this approach is
    useful to alleviate or postpone some of the motor and psychiatric manifestations of
    HD.  Dr. Lucas noted that the 5-HT1B receptor is reduced in HD.  This hypothesis
    will be tested in the 5-HT1B knock-out mouse generated by Rene Hen.  The
    receptor is expressed in the caudate putamen and the protein is enriched in the
    axon terminals in the globus pallidus and the substantia nigra.  In the substantia
    nigra, the 5-HT1B receptor is known to modulate GABA release and therefore the
    activity of dopaminergic neurons.  Dr. Lucas noted that if his hypothesis is true, it is
    possible that the knockout background might exacerbate a subtle phenotype in
    transgenic lines with a low level of regionally restricted mutant protein expression.
    Similarly, it is possible that administration of the few selective agonists that are
    available for the 5-HT1B receptor might attenuate the phenotype of some mouse
    models.
   
    Behavioral Analysis

      Dr. Bach stressed that since many of the transgenic and knock-in models are
    exhibiting non-ambulatory motor disruptions (tremors, stereotype grooming, chorea
    like movements) quantification of these behaviors is vital.  Quantification will allow
    progression of the phenotype to be documented.  Also through quantification, a
    baseline can be generated that can be used to assess the effect of genetic
    (antisense, etc. ) or pharmacological treatment.  Commercially available
    transducers have been employed for many years to measure tremors in rats.  Most
    recently, Coulbourn Instruments has created a transducer that is sensitive enough
    to measure tremors in mice.  The benefits of using instrumentation to measure
    non-ambulatory motor disruptions include objectivity and reproducibility.  Objectivity
    becomes especially important given that a blind study will be most difficult to
    implement since both subtle and gross phenotypes have been observed.

      The second point that Dr. Bach made was that electrophysiological and lesion
    studies have elucidated that the dorsal striatum subserves a specific learning and
    memory system (Graybiel et al; Dunnett et al; McDonald et al).  The caudate area
    of the striatum is required for learning to emit a specific response in the presence
    of a specific cue.  Striatum dependent learning and memory can be assessed
    through various measures including simultaneous brightness discrimination, cued
    go/no go olfactory discrimination, active avoidance and the cued versions of the
    radial arm, Barnes and Morris mazes.  The fact that poor performance on a given
    task can reveal a defect in a specific anatomical location can prove valuable when
    no gross pathology is detected. 

      If learning and memory studies are implemented, the appropriate controls need
    to be used to assure that any impairment observed is not due to performance
    defects (motor, sensory, attentional, motivational, etc).  This is especially important
    given the non-ambulatory motor disruptions observed in many of the mice.  Lastly,
    the effect of seizures has to be taken into account when interpreting the results of
    learning and memory tasks.  It is very clear that seizures profoundly impair
    hippocampal-dependent learning and memory.  Little is known regarding the effect
    of seizures on striatum-dependent memory.

      Drs. Bates and Detloff made the point that in depth analysis of the mutants was
    not their object, rather they sought a general description.  Both suggested that the
    battery of sensorimotor tasks comprised by Irwin might be valuable to employ
    (Irwin, S. , (1968). Psychoparmacolgia, 13, 222-257).  Dr. Bates also noted that a
    similar battery called SHIRPA is being employed by several groups in the U.K. and
    will soon be published on the Harwell web site.  Dr. Bach made the point, using the
    example of the task which measures forearm strength, that many different
    transgenic mice unrelated to the mouse models of HD have been observed to have
    forearm weakness on this task as well as aged rodents.  Therefore using tasks
    subserved by an undefined anatomical locus may generate red herrings which
    many not be ameliorated by either genetic or pharmacological treatment because
    they are not directly mediated by the mechanism that causes HD.  

      A discussion ensued regarding which aspects of the phenotypes should be
    targeted for therapeutic approaches.  Dr. Beal noted that there are currently
    several different compounds that can be tested for efficacy in the mouse models.
    Dr. Shoulson suggested that in the case of Dr. Bates' mice the dramatic weight
    loss observed would serve as an ideal index of phenotype onset and progression
    especially given that people with HD also exhibit weight loss (none of the other
    transgenic or knock-ins exhibit this loss).  Dr. Efstratiadis noted that growth curves
    can be generated for this purpose and may prove valuable in deciphering whether
    these mice exhibit a failure to gain or weight loss.  Dr. Beal mentioned that brain
    weight and morphometry might prove valuable.  Ultimately, no consensus was
    reached in terms of what aspects of the phenotypes should be targeted for
    therapeutic approaches.  The idea that phenotypes observed in mouse models of
    HD may not mimic those observed in HD was raised.  It was decided that this may
    be come clear with the emergence of future models and more in depth analysis of
    current models. 

      The last point that Dr. Bach raised was the issue of strain-related effects.
    Recent work in her laboratory revealed that transgenic mice on a CBA background
    showed defects in hippocampal-dependent learning in the wild-type mice that
    correlated with defects in LTP.  The CBA strain it turns out is plagued with
    problems ranging from retina degeneration to severe seizures.  The laboratory is
    now breeding back on to a C57 background given that this strain exhibits good
    learning and memory.  Little is known about striatum functioning across strains
    other than strain related differences in vulnerability to MPTP neurotoxicity have
    been observed.  A discussion ensued regarding strain-related affects although no
    consensus emerged regarding which strains would be best to employ within the
    mouse models of HD.
   
    Cell Biology, Assays and Neurodegeneration

      Dr. Signer noted that the cell biology of HD gene function greatly lags behind
    the mouse model research and that a cellular model of HD is needed to screen for
    possible therapeutic compounds quickly and efficiently.  E. Coli, yeast and tissue
    culture models were all suggested as possible models of the neuro-degenerative
    mechanisms mediated by the HD gene/protein.  Dr. Hodgson noted that clues to
    these neuro-degenerative mechanisms may be revealed by studying in vitro  the
    basic biochemistry of the protein and the nature of its interactions with other
    proteins.  Further, the use of a yeast cellular model may prove to be an extremely
    valuable tool when studying some basic cellular functions of the HD protein.  Dr.
    Swanson noted that the regulation and function of genes and their products are
    often different in different tissues and cell types and therefore it is important to gain
    as much information about these issues in human striatum neurons.  It was also
    proposed that the establishment of striatal cultures from the transgenic and knock-
    in mice may provide a useful cellular model.  It was suggested that the various
    laboratories generating these mice forward cells to a centralized laboratory that
    would make hybrid system cultures that could be used to systematically screen
    (with different markers) possible therapeutic compounds quickly and efficiently.  Dr.
    Detloff noted that a efficient high output screen will be vital given that
    pharmaceutical firms may be less interested in HD given that it affects only a small
    population of individuals.  One caveat that was raised is that in Alzheimer's disease
    much is known at the cellular level but this information has not lead to a cure. 

      The contribution to the search for a cure from information gained from
    neuropathogical studies was discussed next.  Dr. Tobin asked what can be learned
    from neuropathogical studies of people with HD and what is the best approach.  It
    was suggested that one valuable approach would be to study people at risk for HD
    as little is known regarding what happens early in HD.  These studies might
    reconcile differences observed between human and mouse phenotypes.  Neuronal
    cell counts was one method suggested.  Given that much money was donated for
    brain tissue from people with HD to be stored in a brain bank it was asked what
    had been learned from the stored tissue?  Another approach that was suggested
    was doing biopsies on people undergoing fetal cell transplant therapy.
   
    Genetic Therapy

      Many of the participants felt that ultimately HD would not be cured until the
    defective gene was replaced.  Although this is currently not feasible other potential
    gene therapies were noted.  Dr. MacDonald suggested an approach that could be
    tested in exsisting mouse models of HD involving antisense or complementation by
    wild-type gene products.  One specific hypothesis that could be tested involves
    overexpressing the wild-type gene to determine whether a gene dose effect is
    important for the phenotype observed in HD.  To test whether the toxic gain of
    function in HD can be reversed by overexpression of the wild-type gene a mutant
    mouse can be mated to one that overexpresses the normal HD gene.  It was also
    suggested that further analysis of the mouse models could elucidate whether the
    phenotype observed in HD is the result of gain or loss of function and that this
    analysis could have important implication for therapeutic approaches.  Lastly, Dr.
    MacDonald noted that more biochemistry needs to be done to figure out what the
    HD protein is doing. 
   
    Cre/loxP Summary (as per Dr. Zeitlin)

      The generation of developmental and/or tissue-specific deletions in the mouse
    genome requires an efficient site-specific recombination system.  Many
    laboratories have adopted the cre/loxP system derived from bacteriorphage P1
    (see Sauer and Henderson, 1990).  In the most common use of the system, two 34
    bp loxP sequences in the same orientation
    [5'-ATAACTTCGTATAATGTATGCTATACGAAGTTATTCGA-3'] are placed flanking
    the DNA sequence to be deleted.  In the presence of the Cre recombinase
    enzyme, the DNA between the two loxP sites is looped out and recombination
    occurs within the loxP sequence.  Following recombination, one loxP site remains
    in the genome and the deleted DNA (circular product) is eventually degraded.

      For the purpose of generating conditional mutations, the Cre recombinase gene
    is usually placed under the control of a tissue-specific promoter and introduced as
    a transgene into the mouse.  Standard gene-targeting methods are used to
    generate a mouse with the target sequences flanked by loxP sites.  Although not
    required, many investigators will mate the conditional mutant mice with a mouse
    already heterozygous for a null mutation in the target gene to generate progeny
    that will have one loxP-modified allele and one null allele.  In this case, the Cre
    recombinase will only have to recombine one allele to generate the tissue/stage-
    specific null mutation (Gu et al., 1994).  The loxP-modified mice are now, in turn,
    mated with the mice containing the Cre transgene.  In the fraction of the progeny
    that contain both the transgene and the loxP-modified allele, recombination will
    take place in those tissues expressing the transgene.

      For the knock-in model mice, the cre/loxP system was used to eliminate the neo
    cassette from the targeted allele containing the expanded CAG repeat.  Pop-out of
    the loxP-flanked neo-cassette, leaving behind one integrated loxP site, can be
    accomplished several different ways.  First, by mating the mice to a Cre transgenic
    mouse that expresses the recombinase early in development (from Gail Martin's
    laboratory).  The progeny have the neo cassette removed in all cells.  Alternatively,
    one can eliminate the neo cassette in cell culture by transient transfection of a Cre
    expression plasmid in hte ES cell.  Without selection, between 1-5% of the cells
    undergo recombinations.
   
    References:
    Gu, H. et al., (1994).  Science, 265, 103-106
    Sauer, B. and Henderson, N., (1990).  New Biologist, 2, 441-449.
    Schwenk, F., et al., (1995).  Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 5080-5081.

 

Hereditary Disease Foundation
     

This site is copyrighted © 2008 Hereditary Disease Foundation. All rights reserved.
Site Maintained by  DorriOlds.com
.